FDA Issues Draft Guidance on Considering Patient Perspectives on Medical Devices

October 1, 2020

Categories: AAMI News, Early Career, Executive , Government, HTM Professionals, Individual Contributor, Manager or Director, Medical Device Manufacturers, Medical Device Manufacturing, Sterilization Professionals

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) wants to listen to patients who use medical devices, as evidenced by the agency’s release of a draft guidance, Principles for Selecting, Developing, Modifying, and Adapting Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Use in Medical Device Evaluation.

FDA defines a patient-reported outcome (PRO) as “a measurement based on a report that comes directly from the patient about the status of a patient’s health condition without amendment or interpretation of the patient’s response by a clinician or others.” PROs can capture symptoms as well as the quality of “activities of daily life.” A PRO measure is the instrument or tool, typically a questionnaire or diary, used to evaluate health status.

FDA said that PRO measures can provide evidence for benefitrisk assessments and can be used in medical device labeling to communicate the effect of a treatment on patient symptoms and functioning. PRO measures can also help determine who should be included in a clinical study.

The objectives for FDA’s Aug. 31 guidance on using PRO measures are to:

  • Describe principles that may be considered when using PRO instruments in the evaluation of medical devices.
  • Provide recommendations about the importance of ensuring the PRO instruments are fit for purpose.
  • Outline best practices to help ensure relevant, reliable, and sufficiently robust PRO instruments are developed, modified, or adapted using the least burdensome approach.

According to FDA, patient preference information can inform the design of a medical device, affect how a clinical study is designed, and be used to understand the impact of the clinical study results on patients. This information can help in:

  • Identifying the most important benefits and risks of a technology from a patient’s perspective.
  • Assessing the importance of clinical study outcomes to patients.
  • Determining a meaningful change in study outcomes.
  • Clarifying how patients think about the tradeoffs of these benefits and risks for a given technology.
  • Showing how patient preferences vary across a population in relation to the benefits and risks of various treatment options.